๐๐ฒ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐...
Everyone is asking:
โข Which agent(s) should we build?
โข Which framework and tools should we use?
โข Which model(s) should we choose?
After spending the past several months building and studying enterprise AI architectures, Iโve come to believe those are the wrong first questions.
The biggest challenge isnโt building agents.
It isnโt choosing another framework.
The biggest challenge is giving AI enough business understanding to reason effectively.
Most enterprises already have enormous amounts of data.
The problem is that the data is fragmented, inconsistent, and often lacks business meaning.
An AI agent doesnโt just need customer records.
It needs to understand:
โข How those records relate
โข What the business rules are
โข Which metrics matter
โข Which policies apply
โข When action should be taken
Technologies such as enterprise search, vector search, GraphRAG, and knowledge graphs are essential building blocks. They help AI retrieve relevant information and connect relationships.
But enterprise AI requires something more.
It also requires trusted enterprise contextโa shared understanding of the relationships, business rules, metrics, policies, and operational knowledge that define how the business actually operates.
Examples include:
โข Customer priority and tiers
โข Supplier risk and dependencies
โข Business policies and approval rules
โข Service-level agreements (SLAs)
โข Regulatory requirements
โข Inventory thresholds
โข Revenue impact and business priorities
This is a mental model Iโve found most useful when thinking about enterprise AI:
๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ โ ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ โ ๐ง๐ฟ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ โ ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด โ ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
The organizations that succeed wonโt necessarily be the ones that build the most agents โ theyโll be the ones that first make their business understandable to AI.